Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (6do encyclopedia)230511



The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is a federal agency in the United States that was established in 1965. Its main purpose is to enforce the federal anti-discrimination laws that prohibit employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or genetic information. The EEOC is responsible for investigating and resolving complaints of discrimination, filing lawsuits against employers who violate the laws, and providing education and outreach to employers and employees about their rights and responsibilities under the laws.

The history of the EEOC dates back to the 1950s and 1960s when the civil rights movement was gaining momentum in the United States. At that time, discrimination in the workplace was common, and civil rights advocates began calling for federal legislation to address the problem. In 1964, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, which among other things, banned discrimination in the workplace based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The following year, the EEOC was established as part of the Civil Rights Act Amendments of 1965.

The EEOC is headquartered in Washington, D.C., and has 53 field offices throughout the United States. The agency is led by five Commissioners, one of whom is designated as the Chair. The Commissioners are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, and serve staggered five-year terms. The Chair is appointed by the President from among the Commissioners and serves a two-year term.

The EEOC is responsible for enforcing several federal anti-discrimination laws, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). These laws prohibit employers from discriminating against employees or job applicants based on certain protected characteristics, and provide remedies for individuals who have been subjected to discrimination.

One of the main functions of the EEOC is to investigate and resolve complaints of discrimination that are filed by individuals or groups. An individual who believes that he or she has been subjected to discrimination in the workplace may file a Charge of Discrimination with the EEOC. The Charge must be filed within a certain time period after the alleged discrimination occurred, and must provide information about the discrimination and the employer. The EEOC investigates the Charge, which may involve requesting information from the employer and conducting interviews with the parties involved. If the EEOC finds that there is reasonable cause to believe that discrimination occurred, it may attempt to resolve the matter through mediation or conciliation. If those efforts are unsuccessful, the EEOC may file a lawsuit against the employer.

In addition to investigating complaints of discrimination, the EEOC also conducts outreach and education activities to increase awareness of the anti-discrimination laws and promote compliance with them. The EEOC provides training and technical assistance to employers, employees, and other stakeholders, and produces publications and other materials that explain the laws and their requirements.

The EEOC has faced criticism over the years from various groups, including employers, employees, and civil rights advocates. Employers have criticized the agency for being too aggressive in pursuing discrimination claims, which they claim can be costly and time-consuming to defend against. Employees and civil rights advocates have criticized the agency for not doing enough to protect workers from discrimination, particularly in cases involving systemic discrimination or harassment.

Despite these criticisms, the EEOC remains an important agency in the fight against workplace discrimination in the United States. Through its enforcement, education, and outreach activities, the agency plays a crucial role in ensuring that all workers have an equal opportunity to succeed in the workplace, regardless of their background or identity.


Disclaimer
6do Encyclopedia represents the inaugural AI-driven knowledge repository, and we cordially invite all community users to collaborate and contribute to the enhancement of its accuracy and completeness.
Should you identify any inaccuracies or discrepancies, we respectfully request that you promptly bring these to our attention. Furthermore, you are encouraged to engage in dialogue with the 6do AI chatbot for clarifications.
Please be advised that when utilizing the resources provided by 6do Encyclopedia, users must exercise due care and diligence with respect to the information contained therein. We expressly disclaim any and all legal liabilities arising from the use of such content.

Pregnant, laid off and left without healthcare

The Independent

23-05-11 16:13


Pregnant women in the tech industry are particularly vulnerable to job terminations, which has been highlighted by recent rounds of Silicon Valley layoffs. Exempt from the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 are companies with fewer than 15 employees. Employers must prove that a termination has nothing to do with an employee's maternity leave but can terminate an employee while they are on leave. Pregnancy discrimination affects females' lives both professionally and personally and can lead to long-lasting implications. The Family and Medical Leave workers bank on to keep things afloat while caring for newborns can suddenly dissipate. It affects women in all sectors.

Approximately 54,000 women lose their jobs in the US annually due to pregnancy discrimination. Employment lawyers argue that the US does not have enough legal protections for pregnant people or those on maternity leave. Filmmaker Elisa Filman commented that it is always challenging to prove intent, especially when there are other factors, and that it is up to the judge or jury to determine which explanation is more credible. Without proper legislation, bad behaviour could continue unchecked.

When interviewing for jobs, newly laid-off pregnant people must decide how much of their pregnancy to disclose. They may experience anxiety about demonstrating commitment to their career to potential employers. Some prefer to keep it a secret, while others bring it up. Women described that period as “one of the most stressful times of our lives” and have spoken out about the unspoken stigma that still exists for pregnant employees.


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/pregnant-laid-off-maternity-discrimination-twitter-google-meta-b2336568.html

EEOC probe into company's absence policy limited to single factory

Reuters

23-05-10 17:30


The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) must limit its disability discrimination probe of Eberspaecher North America to an Alabama-based auto parts plant. A divided 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that data sought by the EEOC under a 2020 subpoena, covering seven factories, was irrelevant to an investigation into disability-related bias allegations at its Northport, Alabama facility. An employee at the Northport plant claimed he was unfairly dismissed due to a chronic medical condition and an EEOC commissioner later filed a broader charge against the German company's US operation headquartered in South Carolina.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/eeoc-probe-into-companys-absence-policy-limited-single-factory-2023-05-10/
Goldman Sachs shells out US$215 million to end case on underpaying women

South China Morning Post

23-05-09 03:04


Goldman Sachs has agreed to pay $215m to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by 2,800 women accusing the bank of systemically underpaying them and discriminating against them in pay and promotion decisions. About a third of the settlement will be set aside to cover legal fees. The deal was struck ahead of an upcoming trial that would have allowed discussion of inequality in the financial industry, which has only ever seen male leaders. The case, brought by Cristina Chen-Oster, who joined the bank in 1997 and sued in 2010, was defended by Goldman, which sent some women in the case to arbitration.

https://www.scmp.com/news/world/united-states-canada/article/3219875/goldman-shells-out-us215-million-settle-case-underpaying-women
AI’s footprint in the workplace spreads as D.C. stalls on guardrails

Politico

23-05-06 07:00


The Hollywood writers’ strike is highlighting AI’s growing prominence as a labor issue — and Washington’s dithering over addressing concerns about the technology. The roughly 11,500 television and movie screenwriters unionized under the Writers Guild of America went on strike this week, in part over their concerns about studios potentially using AI to generate scripts and threaten jobs in an already precarious industry. The union pushback is an effort to rein in the adoption of technology that is proliferating with few regulatory constraints, as attempts to regulate the wide-ranging field in the U.S. and Europe struggle to keep up with the pace of developments. Advances in generative AI could eventually expose “the equivalent of 300 million full-time jobs to automation,” economists at Goldman Sachs estimated last month, with two-thirds of all occupations affected in some fashion. The Biden administration has sought to look into how companies are using AI and other automated tools on their employees, and on Thursday the White House pledged to formulate draft guidelines regarding federal agencies’ use of AI, building upon its “Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights” released last year.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/06/ais-footprint-in-the-workplace-spreads-as-d-c-stalls-on-guardrails-00095418
Who is conservative activist Leonard Leo? A friend of Clarence Thomas.

Washington Post

23-05-05 18:40


Leonard Leo, who has described himself as “a leader of the conservative legal movement”, has faced scrutiny over his relationship with Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Leo has been one of Thomas’s closest allies as the former advisor to former President Donald Trump has steered the Supreme Court to the right. However, the issue arose after it was revealed that Leo instructed the conservative pollster Kellyanne Conway in 2012 to bill the Judicial Education Project – a non-profit group he advises – and use that money to pay Thomas’s wife for work consulting, specifying that her name be left off billing records. Critics have called the relationship a conflict of interest for Clarence Thomas. Leo defended the Thomases and said he left Ginni Thomas’s name off the documents to protect their privacy. Leo became one of Thomas’s closest allies due to their meeting in September 1990 when Leo walked into Thomas’s office and saw a statue of St. Jude. Since then, Leo has led campaigns for the Supreme Court nominations of all conservative judges currently on the high court.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/05/05/leonard-leo-clarence-thomas-ginni/
Check your artificial intelligence ‘bossware’ tools for bias, says U.S. agency head

Associated Press

23-05-18 15:54


Charlotte Burrows, chair of the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has warned that AI-driven monitoring tools in the workplace can breach discrimination laws. Burrows said that if companies use such tracking system and employ algorithms that unfairly favour candidates, the Commission will not hesitate to intervene. The agency recently released guidance on AI automation in employment decisions, intended to help businesses and technology providers understand how to stay within the law. Burrows cited resume-screening software as an example of how AI could yield biased results. Amazon abandoned its own recruitment software after realising it favoured male workers because it was based on the company's own male-dominated tech workforce.

https://apnews.com/article/bossware-eeoc-artificial-intelligence-job-discrimination-48f2da9321a023aa102e636026667bb4
U.S. House Republicans question anti-bias agency's 'subpar' record

Reuters

23-05-18 14:20


Criticism has been levelled at the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by Republicans in Congress, who accused the body of performing inadequately under the administration of Joe Biden. At issue was the backlog of workplace discrimination complaints, which the EEOC experienced in 2021, as the US attempted to emerge from Covid-19. It also handled a larger than usual number of phone calls and emails from workers. The backlog of complaints had reduced during the administration of former president Donald Trump. Congress members have also requested data for the types of discrimination, based on sex, race and other factors.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-house-republicans-question-anti-bias-agencys-subpar-record-2023-05-18/
What women employees say about Goldman Sachs’ culture

Financial Times

23-05-19 20:20


Goldman Sachs is still grappling with the discrimination issues highlighted in the class action lawsuit filed by the bank’s female employees in 2010, according to a report in the Financial Times. While there are fewer signs of overt sexism, women complain of inaccessible cultures, exclusion and a lack of support. “I would’ve been better compensated if I wasn’t a mom, for guys, most of the people I interacted with, their wives didn’t work”, said one woman who recently left the bank. Among other complaints, female employees note Goldman’s culture remains less receptive to women who have no interest in sports and the difficulty of confronting controversial issues without damaging their careers, as one junior employee said. Goldman Sachs agreed to pay $215m, one of the biggest payouts in US corporate history, to settle the discrimination case.

https://www.ft.com/content/54bc83e3-aeaf-46a2-b004-e2deb0785022