appeals (6do encyclopedia)



An appeal is a formal request for a higher court to review and possibly overturn a decision made by a lower court or administrative body. This process is typically used when a party disagrees with the decision made by the lower court or administrative body and believes that an error of law or fact was made.

Appeals typically follow a specific process and must be filed within a certain amount of time after the lower court or administrative decision has been made. Additionally, there are specific rules and procedures that must be followed when filing an appeal.

In the United States, appeals are typically heard by a higher court, such as an appellate court or a state supreme court. In other countries, appeals may be heard by a different type of court or administrative body.

The grounds for filing an appeal can vary depending on the specific case and the laws in the jurisdiction. Some common grounds for filing an appeal may include:

  • Error of law or fact: A party may file an appeal if they believe that the lower court or administrative body made a mistake of law or fact that affected the outcome of the case.
  • Incorrect interpretation or application of the law: If a party believes that the lower court or administrative body incorrectly interpreted or applied the law, they may file an appeal.
  • Constitutional issues: If a party believes that the lower court or administrative body’s decision violates their constitutional rights, they may file an appeal.

In order to file an appeal, the appealing party must typically submit a written brief outlining the grounds for the appeal and arguing why the lower court or administrative body’s decision should be overturned. The responding party may also submit a brief outlining why the decision should be upheld.

In some cases, oral arguments may be heard by the higher court. This allows both parties to present their arguments and respond to questions from the judges.

After reviewing the parties’ briefs and hearing oral arguments (if applicable), the higher court will issue a decision. The decision may uphold the lower court or administrative body’s decision, overturn it, or remand the case back to the lower court or administrative body for further review.

If the decision is upheld, the appealing party may have the option to file a further appeal to a higher court (if available). However, the rules and procedures for additional appeals may be more stringent.

Overall, appeals play an important role in the legal system by providing a mechanism for parties to challenge decisions they believe are incorrect or unjust. While the appeals process can be complex and time-consuming, it allows for a fair and impartial review of the facts and law involved in a case.


Disclaimer
6do Encyclopedia represents the inaugural AI-driven knowledge repository, and we cordially invite all community users to collaborate and contribute to the enhancement of its accuracy and completeness.
Should you identify any inaccuracies or discrepancies, we respectfully request that you promptly bring these to our attention. Furthermore, you are encouraged to engage in dialogue with the 6do AI chatbot for clarifications.
Please be advised that when utilizing the resources provided by 6do Encyclopedia, users must exercise due care and diligence with respect to the information contained therein. We expressly disclaim any and all legal liabilities arising from the use of such content.

Abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme Court

The Independent

23-05-17 04:14


A case challenging the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) decision to approve a medication used for medical abortions over two decades ago will move to a federal appeals court in New Orleans. The case concerns mifepristone and relates to the FDA's initial approval in 2000, as well as actions to make the drug more accessible. It comes nearly a year after the US Supreme Court overturned the Roe v. Wade ruling establishing abortion rights. It is expected that the case will reach the Supreme Court, with judges nominated by Donald Trump set to play a significant role.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/supreme-court-ap-food-and-drug-administration-new-orleans-donald-trump-b2340268.html
Court denies Elizabeth Holmes' request to remain free while appealing conviction

Reuters

23-05-17 02:10


Elizabeth Holmes, founder of failed blood-testing startup Theranos, has had her request for bail denied by an appeals court in San Francisco. Holmes, who was sentenced to 11 years and three months in prison after being convicted of defrauding investors, had asked for her sentence to be paused while she appeals her conviction. She rose to fame by claiming Theranos' small machines could run multiple diagnostic tests with just a few drops of blood.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/court-denies-elizabeth-holmes-request-remain-free-while-appealing-conviction-2023-05-17/
US federal judge, 95, faces fresh competency claims as she fights probe

Reuters

23-05-17 01:25


An investigative committee of the U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered Judge Pauline Newman to undergo a neurological evaluation and neuropsychological testing, with a Friday deadline to say whether she will comply. Newman, 95, is facing a competency investigation amid concerns about her ability to handle cases and refusal to cooperate with the investigation. Witness reports included in the order have revealed she has been unable to complete simple tasks independently and threatened a staffer with arrest, while interviews with court staff cited her as claiming without evidence that she is being hacked or bugged.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-federal-judge-95-faces-fresh-competency-claims-she-fights-probe-2023-05-17/
North Carolina GOP overrides veto of 12-week abortion limit, allowing it to become law

The Globe and Mail

23-05-17 11:45


Republican lawmakers in North Carolina have overruled a veto by Governor Roy Cooper to pass legislation banning most abortions after 12 weeks of pregnancy in the state. Members of the party claimed the limits were a middle ground as the state already bans nearly all abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy without rape or incest caveats. The votes were part of a wider shift on the issue across the US, with lawmakers in South Carolina and Nebraska also considering new abortion limits. The North Carolina law will include rape or incest exceptions through 20 weeks of pregnancy and exceptions for "life-limiting" fetal anomalies during the first 24 weeks. The bans are possible as in 2020 the US Supreme Court struck down landmark 1973 ruling Roe v. Wade which had established a nationwide right to abortion.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-north-carolina-gop-overrides-veto-of-12-week-abortion-limit-allowing/
Elizabeth Holmes must repay Rupert Murdoch $125m after Theranos fraud

Telegraph

23-05-17 11:29


Convicted fraudster Elizabeth Holmes and her former boyfriend, and co-founder of Theranos, Ramesh "Sunny" Balwani must repay $125m of a court-ordered $452m in restitution for deceiving investors, including Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch invested $100m in the firm in 2014 and 2015 while Theranos's value and profile soared. It later emerged that bosses were secretly sending blood tests to traditional laboratories. Ms Holmes, who was sentenced to 11 years in prison for the scandal, recently told the New York Times she was "playing a character I created" and needed to be taken "seriously".

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/05/17/elizabeth-holmes-theranos-fraud-repay-rupert-murdoch-125m/
Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes loses appeal to remain free, is hit with huge restitution bill

CBC

23-05-17 11:17


Elizabeth Holmes, the former CEO of Theranos, will soon be going to prison to serve 11 years after the Court of Appeals rejected her bid to remain free while she tried to overturn her conviction in a blood-testing hoax that brought her fleeting fame and fortune. U.S. District Judge Edward Davila also ordered Holmes to pay $452m in restitution to the victims of her crimes. Holmes is being held jointly liable for that amount with her former lover and top Theranos lieutenant, Ramesh (Sunny) Balwani, who is already behind bars after being convicted on a broader range of felonies.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/theranos-holmes-rulings-1.6845975
Tunisian journalist sentenced to 5 years in prison for counterterrorism reporting

The Toronto Star

23-05-17 11:16


Tunisian journalist Khalifa Guesmi has been sentenced to five years in prison by an appeals court after refusing to name sources who revealed sensitive information about a counter-terrorism operation. Guesmi was originally sentenced to one year in jail for the offence. More than 30 rights groups have detailed their opposition to the case, while journalists’ union SNJT said the sentence “threatens the freedom of journalists and damages Tunisia’s image. It is a political message that testifies to an acceleration in punishment of the media and journalists, to intimidate them via the judicial apparatus”.

https://www.thestar.com/news/world/africa/2023/05/17/tunisian-journalist-sentenced-to-5-years-in-prison-for-counterterrorism-reporting.html
Ex-French Pres­i­dent Sarkozy los­es ap­peal against graft con­vic­tion

Al Jazeera

23-05-17 10:25


Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy has lost an appeal against his 2021 corruption and influence-peddling conviction. The Paris Court of Appeals upheld a three-year prison sentence, two of which were suspended, and changed the one-year custodial sentence to wearing an electronic bracelet instead of imprisonment. His lawyers are now appealing the decision before the Court of Cassation, France's highest appeals court. Sarkozy was found guilty after he and his former lawyer, Thierry Herzog, formed a "corruption pact" with Judge Gilbert Azibert to try and obtain and share information on an investigation. This verdict also barred Sarkozy from public office for three years.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/5/17/frances-sarkozy-losses-appeal-against-corruption-conviction
US Supreme Court declines to block Illinois assault weapons ban

Reuters

23-05-17 15:33


The US Supreme Court denied a request to block a Democratic-supported ban on assault-style rifles and large capacity magazines introduced in Illinois, dealing a blow to gun rights advocates. The National Association for Gun Rights and a firearms retailer had sought a temporary injunction to stop implementation of the state law, which was signed by a Democrat governor in January 2023. The move came after a mass shooting in Highland Park, a Chicago suburb, in 2022, which left seven people dead and injured dozens more.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-declines-block-illinois-assault-weapons-ban-2023-05-17/
Do hypothetical risk disclosures give rise to securities claims?

Reuters

23-05-17 14:58


Companies should evaluate whether and how they disclose risks they have identified and should consider whether they need to disclose material facts suggesting a risk "might" occur, even if it has not yet manifested or risen to the level of "near certainty," writes Virginia Milstead in Reuters Legal News. Companies should also consider that their required hypothetical risk disclosures, which warn of outcomes that "may" or "could" arise "if" certain events occur, have become a prime target of securities fraud claims that allege a risk disclosure was misleading or inadequate to warn investors. While most courts so far have held that a hypothetical risk disclosure is only inadequate or misleading if the risk has already materialised or has a near certainty to cause financial harm, a recent case in the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has indicated that a hypothetical risk disclosure may be insufficient if it fails to include facts showing that the risk “might” occur.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/do-hypothetical-risk-disclosures-give-rise-securities-claims-2023-05-17/
Key abortion debates this week in US courts and statehouses

The Independent

23-05-17 14:32


States are reigniting legal battles against each other on the issue of abortion, with Nebraska, South Carolina and GOP-controlled states seeking to enforce stricter bans on the procedure. Most Republican-dominated states have enacted tighter restrictions on abortions since the Dobbs ruling last year. However, Virginia has maintained the status quo, while Vermont has adopted a constitutional amendment to preserve access to abortion. Montana has also signed a bill banning dilation and evacuation abortions, with legal action again expected. An anti-abortion case could also reach the US Supreme Court after a hearing in the New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals over the use of mifepristone.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ap-virginia-roy-cooper-greg-gianforte-change-b2340680.html
Elizabeth Holmes loses bid to avoid prison

CNN

23-05-17 14:18


Disgraced Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes has failed in her last-minute bid to avoid beginning her 11-year jail sentence after an appellate court refused to let her remain free on bail. Holmes was also ordered to pay $452m in restitution to those affected by her crimes. The same order was handed down to Holmes's ex-boyfriend and former Theranos COO Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, with the pair being "jointly and severally liable".

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/05/17/tech/elizabeth-holmes-bid-denied/index.html
Ex-French president Sarkozy loses corruption appeal, must wear ankle monitor

Washington Post

23-05-17 12:54


Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy has lost his appeal for conviction for corruption and influence peddling, meaning he will now wear an ankle monitor. The Paris Court of Appeals upheld his three-year prison sentence, with two years to be suspended. Sarkozy was found guilty of attempting to bribe a judge. His lawyers claim he is innocent and announced plans to appeal the decision to France's highest court. Sarkozy is also facing separate charges for accepting illegal campaign payments from Libya during his 2007 election bid. He was found guilty of illegal campaign financing in 2021.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/05/17/sarkozy-corruption-appeal-ankle-tag/
Quinn Emanuel slams 'fishing expedition' in dispute over $185 million fee award

Reuters

23-05-17 18:48


Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan has justified its management of $185m in legal fees that were awarded following the US government’s healthcare act. The law firm was representing 30 health insurers, including UnitedHealthcare and the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, in securing a $2bn settlement with the government. Now the insurers are demanding to know how the fees were distributed, after the federal appeals court withdrew the $185m payment, thus launching a new battle. Quinn Emanuel told the US Federal Claims court that it would pay back any difference following a review of the firm's handling of the funds.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/quinn-emanuel-slams-fishing-expedition-dispute-over-185-million-fee-award-2023-05-17/
Bad timing: Federal courts are poised to backtrack on remote access

Reuters

23-05-17 17:54


The US federal courts will soon terminate public audio access to proceedings. The experiment was launched in 2018 and intended to assist greater transparency for judicial procedures; however, the Judicial Conference executive committee decided to abandon access because the pandemic no longer hampers the facilities, and remote sites will no longer be able;e to access audio and visual feeds of the legal process. Whilst some judges may view the ban as positive, law professor Sonja West has argued that remote broadcasts continue to be a "powerful tool" for citizens who otherwise faced obstacles attending court.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/bad-timing-federal-courts-are-poised-backtrack-remote-access-2023-05-17/
Senate panel hails rare unity on Biden nominee for 5th Circuit judge

Reuters

23-05-17 17:31


Texas magistrate judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez has been announced as the Biden administration's nominee to the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals after being recommended by Texas' two Republican senators. If confirmed, she would be the first Hispanic woman and only active Hispanic judge on the court. Her nomination is seen as an example of how Democrats and Republicans can work together to advance judicial nominees. Republicans have previously been accused of exploiting the "blue slip" tradition to stall nominations, a practice that Democrats are urging the Senate to do away with.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/senate-panel-hails-rare-unity-biden-nominee-5th-circuit-judge-2023-05-17/
North Carolina Senate votes on state government budget

Associated Press

23-05-17 23:14


The North Carolina Senate Republicans have given their initial approval of a budget proposal on Wednesday that outlines a plan that differs on priorities, tax details and a host of policy prescriptions from the opposing House measure, despite spending the same amount. The Senate plan has been criticised by Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper and includes lacklustre pay raises for teachers and rank-and-file state employees, while the bill would lower individual income taxes and introduce new excise taxes on ride-sharing services, with proceeds going towards road maintenance.

https://apnews.com/article/north-carolina-senate-government-budget-99868f607b3c71a3dd6c299af41780f1
US judge in Texas dismisses charges against Swiss banker allegedly tied to Venezuela bribery scheme

Associated Press

23-05-17 22:36


A federal judge in Houston has dismissed criminal charges against Paulo Murta, a Swiss banker accused of helping stash millions in bribes paid to senior Venezuelian oil officials in a money laundering case. The judge ruled that the delays violated his constitutional rights to a speedy trial. Murta was indicted in 2019 on money laundering charges and spent nine months in pre-trial detention before being released on bond. Prosecutors are appealing against the dismissal of charges. Murta was accused of creating fake loans and setting up shell companies in Switzerland, Curacao and Dubai to hide the proceeds of PDVSA's bribery scheme.

https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-corruption-bribery-swiss-banker-2dbd8ae7ff7984deb495aa43fcbaf5ef
US court overturns Arizona jaguar protections amid copper mine fight

Reuters

23-05-17 22:06


A US appeals court has overturned critical habitat designations for an endangered species of jaguar in Arizona. The ruling is a boost to Hudbay Minerals subsidiary Rosemont Copper, which is proposing to build a $1.9bn open-pit copper mine in the area. A federal district court had previously backed the 2014 designation of over 350,000 acres in mountains southeast of Tucson as critical for the jaguar, and it is unclear whether the latest decision could help the company’s mining plan since the ruling applied to just a portion of the broader jaguar habitat.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-court-overturns-arizona-jaguar-protections-amid-copper-mine-fight-2023-05-17/